Menu

Search results

Search results

435 results for:

UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on Remedies and Procedures on the Right of Anyone Deprived of His or Her Liberty by Arrest or Detention to Bring Proceedings Before Court

Resource Bank

Read

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR“)

This is a foundational human rights instrument. Although not binding, it was the first authoritative statement of rights that are now set out in multiple human rights treaties and constitutions.

Resource Bank

Read

Article 253, Costa Rica Criminal Code

Under Costa Rica’s Criminal Code, a judge must review bail decisions every 3 months an accused is in custody. Similar rules exist in El Salvador, Paraguay, Venezuela and the Dominican Republic.

Resource Bank

Read

Prosecution of Offences Regulations 1987 (UK)

This law sets the following framework of time limits: 56 days for “summary trials” (these are for less serious offences); and 182 days for “indictable offences” sent to the Crown Court (these are more serious offences). When the relevant custody time limit expires, the accused must be released on bail.

Resource Bank

Read

Gray v DPP (Australia)

A man’s trial was delayed so much that he had already served more time than the maximum sentence related to the alleged crime. The Victorian Supreme Court found imposing such a sentence would breach his right to liberty.

Resource Bank

Read

Assenov v Bulgaria (European Court of Human Rights)

An individual had been charged with sixteen or more burglaries and was not released on bail because it was feared that he would re-offend if released. He ended up being held in pre-trial detention for 2 years. The European Court ruled that he had been denied a “trial within a reasonable time” in violation of article […]

Resource Bank

Read

Clark and Garrison v Attorney-General (The Gambia)

The Gambian Supreme Court ruled that to determine what is “reasonable time”, the Court should be guided by the following factors: The length of the delay; The reasons given by the prosecution to justify the delay; The consequences for the delay; and The responsibility of the accused for asserting his or her rights.

Resource Bank

Read

Fillastre v Bolivia (UN Human Rights Committee)

Fillastre was charged in 1987 for offences punishable by imprisonment of one to five years. His proceedings were delayed, partly due to the judge’s desire to gather further evidence, and he was expected to be tried in 1991. First, the UNHRC held that “what constitutes ‘reasonable time’ is a matter of assessment for each particular […]

Resource Bank

Read

Article 19, The Gambian Constitution

(5) If any person arrested or detained is not tried within a reasonable time, then without prejudice to any further proceedings which may be brought against him or her, he or she shall be released either unconditionally or upon reasonable conditions, including, in particular, such conditions as are reasonably necessary to ensure that he or she appears at […]

Resource Bank

Read

Buzadji v Moldova (European Court of Human Rights)

A Moldovan businessman was arrested because the police had “reasonable suspicion” he committed fraud. He was denied bail and held in custody for 10 months, before the investigation was ended. This was justified in Moldovan law, which allows people to be held in detention as long as there is a reasonable suspicion they committed a […]

Resource Bank

Read

About Us

Action4Justice is a group of NGO’s united to support public interest litigation worldwide as a means to advance social justice.

Learn more
Our members

We seek partnerships with organizations and communities worldwide who support our goals. Join our network, or volunteer.

Learn more