Menu

Search results

Search results

435 results for:

The People’s Climate Case

The EU General Court rejected the claimant’s arguments that their countries’ GHG reduction targets were too low on the basis that the claim was inadmissible because the claimants were not individually concerned by EU law on climate change (i.e. they lacked sufficient interest).

Resource Bank

Read

The IPCC Reports

The IPCC is an international body for assessing climate science. Hundreds of leading climate scientists take part in it, and 195 representatives of countries are members of the IPCC, giving its findings exceptional weight. The IPCC conducts scientific assessments of existing climate science. Its findings provide the basis for all the major international agreements on […]

Resource Bank

Read

ClientEarth v ENEA

The Claimant, an environmental organisation, purchased some shares in the defendant company and sued it in its capacity as a shareholder in Poland. The Claimant argued that a proposal by ENEA to construct a new coal plant risked breaching board members’ fiduciary duties of due diligence and to act in the best interests of the […]

Resource Bank

Read

Lliuya v RWE AG

A case brought by a Peruvian farmer in German courts against RWE (a German energy company) for their contribution to climate change and its impact on glacial melts and flooding of his community. They demand that RWE contribute to adaptation costs required to protect against flooding.

Resource Bank

Read

EarthLife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs

An environmental organisation in South Africa successfully challenged the opening of a new coal mine on the basis that the responsible public body failed to take into consideration its climate impacts when licensing the project.

Resource Bank

Read

Leghari v Republic of Pakistan

A case was brought against government authorities in Pakistan by a local farmer for their failure to put in place sufficient adaptation measures and the resulting damage to his livelihood. The Court held that Pakistan had violated citizens’ rights to life, dignity and property and ordered the government to take measures to minimise the impacts […]

Resource Bank

Read

Urgenda Foundation v Kingdom of the Netherlands

A Dutch environmental group and 886 citizens sued the Netherlands for not taking enough action to reduce their GHG emissions. In 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court found that the Dutch government must, by 2020, have reduced their GHG emissions by at least 25% from 1990 levels. The government’s failure to do this was a violation […]

Resource Bank

Read

New Model Statute For Citizens to Challenge Governments Failing To Act on Climate Change

The Model Statute provides a number of rationales, precedents and articles that would support climate litigation for the reduction of greenhouse gases.

Resource Bank

Read

Climate Liability News

A website that provides updates on new climate litigation cases.

Resource Bank

Read

The Sabin Center Climate Litigation Database

Columbia Law School’s database provides a comprehensive collection of different pieces of climate litigation brought across the world.

Resource Bank

Read

About Us

Action4Justice is a group of NGO’s united to support public interest litigation worldwide as a means to advance social justice.

Learn more
Our members

We seek partnerships with organizations and communities worldwide who support our goals. Join our network, or volunteer.

Learn more