There is no universal definition of a public body, but the term is generally contrasted with private companies and businesses. They include governments and ministries, as well as local government and all sorts of public councils, authorities, committees, and regulators. Sometimes services of a public nature are carried out by private companies, such as utility companies, and in these cases, the law treats private companies as public bodies. Public law can be used to challenge actions or inactions of public bodies, including their acts, policies, plans or indeed lack of these.
It is the responsibility of public bodies, or government authorities, to carry out the work of the government, and public law regulates the lawfulness of the behaviours of public bodies. If a public body is failing to carry out its responsibilities or to meet the required standards, it may be possible to use public law to hold them to account.
Policies, acts and decisions of public bodies are often susceptible to legal challenge, but rules around what types of policies, laws, and decisions can be challenged vary widely. For example, in the UK, public bodies normally can only be challenged if their actions are unlawful, completely irrational or completely unreasonable. If the challenge is successful, the policy, decision, or action, may be overturned or nullified by the court.
Consider which public bodies you can target with legal action. Ministerial bodies and government officials responsible for overseeing, preventing or regulating elements of freshwater pollution may include the following.
Government Agencies are public or governmental bodies with duties and powers set out by environmental laws. There are usually various departments which are responsible for protecting and improving the different aspects of the environment, including water sources.
Sometimes there are many different environmental agencies, and these can be disjointed and ineffective. For example, in the UK, there are currently many different regulators with overlapping responsibilities, such as one for protecting wildlife habitats from pollution, another for setting rules related to agricultural pollution, another responsible for regulating sewage pollution, another responsible for water monitoring, and yet another for economic water oversight. Meanwhile, decisions on whether to approve a polluting development are made at the local level, while policy and laws are set at the national level.
Sometimes, the department responsible for regulating pollution from factories or agriculture is not the same regulator responsible for monitoring water, so it is frequently necessary to engage with and take legal action against more than one public body. Also consider both local and national authorities and how you might engage with both. Before taking legal action, it is always important to engage with public authorities by submitting freedom of information requests and complaints, bringing the issues to their attention and giving them an opportunity to resolve the issues. Courts frequently require that a claimant show they have tried to resolve the issue before taking legal action, so complaints mechanisms also provide a paper trail of evidence to show a judge.
Water agencies are responsible for regulating the provision of freshwater for human use and the treatment of wastewater. Governance and management of water can often be fragmented, with overlapping jurisdictions between regional or local bodies and national bodies.
Local governments may be responsible for the distribution of freshwater for domestic or agricultural use. They may also have the authority to make planning decisions regarding industrial developments (such as factories).
Complicating things still further, planning decisions are made at the level of local government by local authorities, or District Council Planning Committees. It is their job, in consultation with the other agencies and the public, to assess the water impacts of potentially harmful developments, such as industrial animal farms, data centres, or large housing developments, and decide whether to grant permission. If granted, it is also the responsibility of the local authority to ensure that developers are required to carry out and implement certain planning conditions that will safeguard water resources.
In certain countries, consumer protection agencies may monitor and enforce compliance with consumer protection laws, including competition laws where water is provided by public companies, to ensure available freshwater is not polluted.
In some countries, private companies (rather than public utilities) are responsible for the water supply. In these situations, it is common for laws to exist that make a public regulator or water agency responsible for making sure that the water companies provide consumers with good quality water at a fair price. In practice, privatisation of water has led to numerous complaints that private water companies have focused more on making profits than on provision of a good service.
The UK has adopted this approach, and the Government privatised the water industry in 1989. It is regulated under the Water Act 1989 by an economic regulator, OFWAT. Shareholders in some of the UK’s largest water companies took out tens of billions of pounds but failed to invest, with firms then raising household bills to fund future spending. Much criticism has been levelled at the water companies, many owned by foreign shareholders, for failure to invest to the extent necessary to cope with sewage and agricultural run-off. Ofwat is now planned to be abolished and replaced by a larger regulator to oversee more aspects of water management.
International bodies, such as the UN Environment Programme, the World Health Organisation or the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, provide international oversight over aspects of freshwater pollution. While principles set out by the UN are not directly enforceable in domestic law, the UN sets the agenda for international law, which is then frequently solidified by treaties and later implemented into domestic law. Citing international legal principles and treaties can often help make your arguments stronger.