Menu

Search results

Search results

74 results for:

Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (India)

(3) The Court may impose any condition which the Court considers necessary – (a) in order to ensure that such person shall attend court; or (b) in order to ensure that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or of the commission of which he is […]

Resource Bank

Read

Article: Possibly unconstitutional? The insistence on verification of address in bail hearings

The article analyses and presents a critical review of the bail regime in South Africa.

Resource Bank

Read

Philippines Bail (Rule 114) Nature

In the Philippines, the following types of bail are common: Corporate bond: The bail security is covered by the company of the accused; Property bond: The accused has to put up property as a guarantee for bail; and Cash deposit: The accused has a pay an amount of money that they will get back if […]

Resource Bank

Read

Pakistan Code of Criminal Procedure

The Pakistan Code of Criminal Procedure distinguishes between bailable and non-bailable offences. Bailable offences are less serious offences where a person has a right to bail, as long as they can meet the conditions that are attached to bail (bail conditions are discussed below). The non-bailable offences are split into two categories: (1) Offences not falling […]

Resource Bank

Read

State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur v. Balchand (India)

The Indian Supreme Court ruled that the basic rule is bail, not jail, except where there is a risk the accused may flee from justice, interfere with the course of justice, repeat offences or intimidate witnesses.

Resource Bank

Read

Michael and Brian Hill v Spain (UN HRC)

The HRC held that “pre-trial detention should be the exception and that bail should be granted, except in situations where the likelihood exists that the accused would abscond or destroy evidence, influence witnesses or flee from the jurisdiction of the State party”.

Resource Bank

Read

Alhassan Abubakar v Ghana (African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights)

A Ghanaian citizen was arrested in 1985 for allegedly cooperating with political dissidents and was detained without trial for 7 years until he escaped from a prison hospital. The ACommHPR held that Article 6 of the African Charter was violated as the complainant had been arrested but was not charged with any offence and never […]

Resource Bank

Read

Constitutional Rights Project and Civil Liberties Organisation v Nigeria (African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights)

The ACmHPR found that holding journalists in custody for 3 years without charges amounted to a clear arbitrary detention and grave violation of the right to liberty in Article 6 of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights.

Resource Bank

Read

The Mexican Constitution, Article 19

“Detentions before a judicial authority in excess of 72 hours, counted from the moment the accused is presented to the authority, are prohibited without presenting formal charges indicating the crime, place, time and circumstances of such crime; as well as the evidence of the crime and of the probable liability of the accused.”

Resource Bank

Read

Campbell v Jamaica (UN HRC)

The HRC underlined that “one of the most important reasons for the requirement of ‘prompt’ information on a criminal charge is to enable a detained individual to request a prompt decision on the lawfulness of his or her detention by a competent judicial authority.”

Resource Bank

Read

About Us

Action4Justice is a group of NGO’s united to support public interest litigation worldwide as a means to advance social justice.

Learn more
Our members

We seek partnerships with organizations and communities worldwide who support our goals. Join our network, or volunteer.

Learn more