If you can show that corruption has taken place, it may also be possible for you to bring a civil claim. A civil claim involves arguing a person or corporation violated your private rights.
A question to ask yourself when considering bringing a case to court is whether bringing the case is the right decision for you. You should continue to ask yourself at each stage of your case’s preparation.
The following table of advantages and disadvantages is designed to help you consider whether a civil claim challenging corruption is right for you:
|If you have been financially harmed by a corrupt act, a civil claim could ensure you get compensation for any harm suffered.||Civil claims can generally only be brought by people who have been personally affected by a corrupt act (i.e. a person who has lost property through a corrupt deal). Civil claims can generally not be brought by people trying to challenge corruption in the public interest.|
|Civil claims generally have a lower standard of proof than criminal cases. This can mean that less evidence has to be gathered to bring a successful case, although the evidence still has to be compelling.||The person complaining about the corrupt act is responsible for bringing a civil claim (e.g. gathering evidence, conducting the legal analysis and taking the procedural steps to bring the claim) instead of, for example, law enforcement bodies.|
|Civil claims can be brought against corporations and hold them directly accountable, as well as against individual wrongdoers or public bodies involved in corruption.||Because you are personally bringing the claim, it can put you at greater risk of being targeted for challenging corruption.|
|Depending on the nature of the claim and the legal fee regulations, it can be very expensive to bring civil claims without financial support.|
Once you have outlined the facts of your case, look at the areas of law below and see which most closely relates to your situation. Then check your national law to see what the law is in your country.
Your legal analysis has to be supported by the evidence you have gathered. You may wish to seek legal advice. A lawyer should be able to provide advice on the options available to you and advise on your chances of success.
In some countries, bribery is a civil wrong as well as a crime. The person receiving the bribe and the person giving the bribe can often be liable.
Where you are alleging that a company paid a bribe to a public official, you generally have to show that:
1. The public official received, was offered or promised a “benefit” (i.e. money, property or a service). This could either be given directly to the official, to a family member or a company they own.
2. The company or individual provided, promised or offered the public official with the benefit (i.e. they paid them or gave them property).
3. It was an “undue benefit” given, promised or offered so that the public official would act or refrain from acting in breach of their duties.
Example: The Clean Company Act (Brazil)
The Act establishes that Brazilian companies and companies operating in Brazil can be held civilly liable for bribery, concealing assets, interfering with public procurement processes or investigations.
It does not generally have to be shown that the company deliberately bribed the public official or the public official knew they were receiving a bribe.
Unjust enrichment happens where one person enriches themselves at the expense of another person in a way that is unjust or unfair. Unjust enrichment claims aim to undo the unjust enrichment by returning any of the gains the wrongdoer made to you.
To hold an individual or corporation liable for unjust enrichment, you generally have to show that:
1. The defendant has been enriched
Examples where the defendant (the person or company you are bringing the claim against) has been enriched include:
The value of how much the defendant was enriched should be detailed if possible (i.e. how much money were they paid from a deal?).
2. The enrichment was at your expense
This means you must have suffered some loss that is related to what the defendant gained. For example:
3. The enrichment was “unjust”
One way the enrichment of a defendant could be unjust is if it was secured through corrupt activities. The following could be examples where enrichment is unjust:
If you have a contract/agreement with another individual or company, and you believe they have committed a corrupt act, this could amount to a breach of contract.
If you can prove a breach of contract, this could allow you to:
Example: Decree No.1023/2001 (Argentina)
Article 10 of the Decree establishes that public contracts tainted with corruption will be terminated.
In certain relationships, people owe each other legal obligations called “fiduciary duties”. For example:
These duties require people to:
If a company director or business partner in a company you are involved in is involved in corrupt activity, such as bribery, this will likely be a breach of their fiduciary duties.
Where can I find these duties?
A civil claim for intimidation could be brought where someone has threatened to do something unlawful which had the effect of coercing you into doing something which caused you loss. A claim of duress may entitle you to cancel or rescind a contract which you were pressurised into making by illegitimate or improper threats or actions by the other party.
Check if your country has a similar law that could be used in your case. The Legal 500 Q & A Chapters on Bribery and Corruption or the UNODC Track Portal could be helpful for this purpose.
Civil claims are based on your private rights rather than broader public interests. To bring a civil claim based, you will therefore generally need to be affected by the harm that your claim is based on. For example:
The person bringing the case (and his or her lawyers) are responsible for:
If an employee, director or individual within a company is suspected of being involved in corruption, the company itself may be able to take a civil claim against them. For example, a company could take a civil claim against a director for bribery if this deprived the company of money.
In some cases, such as cases involving breaches of fiduciary duties, the company may be the only body that is able to take a civil claim. This is because fiduciary duties are owed to the company itself, and not other individuals.
In some countries, anti-corruption agencies or public prosecutors can take civil cases on your behalf if you submit a well-founded request or complaint.
The Special Investigations Unit (South Africa)
In South Africa, the “Special Investigations Unit” is empowered to bring civil, administrative and criminal cases against public officials and government bodies suspected of corruption. People can report corrupt activities to the SIU for them to investigate. These reports can then lead to the SIU taking a civil action against the wrongdoer. It can take actions in its own name or on behalf of persons that have filed the complaint to the SIU. In addition, the SIU has a Special Tribunal where it takes civil proceedings against persons and organisations accused of looting money through corruption.
The Public Prosecutor in Brazil
In Brazil, the public prosecutor takes legal action to establish civil and administrative liability of persons suspected of being involved in corruption. The prosecution can take action on behalf of individuals, groups or in the general public interest.
However, in most countries, this possibility is only available for criminal prosecutions.
Civil claims can be brought against individuals, organisations, public authorities or companies which you believe have committed a civil wrong.
This could include:
In civil law actions, it’s the claimant who has the “burden of proof”.
The exact evidence that you need depends on the civil wrong you are arguing that has been committed. However, in civil cases related to corruption, the following will often be important:
Practical Tip: Using a Criminal Conviction as Evidence
If the defendant has been convicted of a crime that relates to the corrupt activity you are complaining about, this criminal conviction can often be used as evidence in civil claims.
- In some countries, such as Germany, a criminal conviction is automatic proof in civil cases of the facts that the conviction was based on. For example, if you are bringing a civil claim of bribery, a criminal conviction that the defendant committed the same incident of bribery will automatically prove that bribery was committed.
- In other countries, such as the UK, the facts that a criminal conviction is based on is presumed to be true for the purpose of a civil claim unless the defendant proves this not to be the case. Therefore, a criminal conviction of bribery will be very strong evidence in a civil case that the defendant committed bribery, but this is not automatic.
- In other countries, you will have to prove again that the defendant committed the corruption, even if there is a previous criminal conviction that relates to the same facts.
For this reason, it may be wise to wait until a criminal investigation has taken place into the corrupt act you are complaining about before bringing a civil claim.
For more information on evidence gathering, see How Can I Prove My Case?
When you have collected your evidence and conducted your legal analysis, you should then be able to start the court claim. The procedure that you have to follow will depend on your country, the type of claim, the court you choose, and on the procedural rules of that court.
Here are some general points of procedure that you may have to follow to pursue a civil claim:
If you bring a successful civil claim against a corporation, the judgment will be an official acknowledgement by a court that the corruption took place and harm was suffered. In addition, you could get one or more of the following “remedies”:
This involves the wrongdoer being ordered to pay “damages” (money) to compensate for the loss you suffered as a result of the corrupt act.
This is where the court orders the wrongdoer to return any money or property that they gained from the corrupt activity.
As a remedy, the court could also order the wrongdoer to do a certain action or stop doing an action.
If the corrupt activity that has caused you loss involves a foreign company or organisation, or there is some other international involvement in the events which took place, you may wish to consider whether.
If you want to find out more about the possibility of bringing a claim against a business in a foreign court, see How Can I Bring a Civil Claim Against a Business in a Foreign Court?